Home Library Mars Rovers Mars Rover Comparison

All 5 NASA Mars Rovers · Side by Side

Mars Rover Comparison

Full Comparison Table

RoverLandingSiteMassPowerCamerasDistanceSolsCostStatus
PerseveranceFeb 2021Jezero Crater1,025 kgMMRTG (nuclear)23$2.7B● Active
CuriosityAug 2012Gale Crater899 kgMMRTG (nuclear)17$2.5B● Active
OpportunityJan 2004Meridiani Planum185 kgSolar panels945.16 km5,352$400M*Completed 2019
SpiritJan 2004Gusev Crater185 kgSolar panels97.73 km2,208$400M*Completed 2010
SojournerJul 1997Ares Vallis10.6 kgSolar + battery3~0.1 km83$265M†Completed 1997

* Combined MER programme cost (Spirit + Opportunity). † Total Pathfinder mission cost.

Evolution of Mars Rovers

From Microwave to SUV

In 29 years, NASA's Mars rovers grew from Sojourner's 10.6 kg — small enough to fit on a desk — to Perseverance's 1,025 kg, roughly the size of a small car. Each generation brought exponential leaps in capability: from Sojourner's single APXS instrument to Perseverance's seven science instruments, 23 cameras, a coring drill, a sample caching system and an oxygen-production experiment.

Solar vs Nuclear

Spirit and Opportunity were solar-powered, making them vulnerable to dust storms and Martian winters. Opportunity ultimately died when a global dust storm blocked all sunlight. Curiosity and Perseverance carry nuclear batteries (MMRTGs) that generate power from plutonium-238 decay, enabling year-round operations regardless of weather or season.

Sky Crane Revolution

Sojourner and the MER twins used airbag landings — bouncing to the surface inside cocoons of inflated bags. Curiosity was too heavy for airbags, so engineers invented the sky crane: a rocket-powered descent stage that lowered the rover on cables for a wheels-down landing. Perseverance reused this system and added terrain-relative navigation, autonomously diverting to avoid hazards during descent.

Explore More